Go back to Flu Mortality


Result for the “BFGS” method for the 1989-1990 epidemic (6 parameters, alpha values are the same for both the models):

For the guess of parameters beta1 = 0.3 alpha = 0.2 Ne = 1377 I1 = 1 beta2 = 0.3 I2 = 1, we obtained

beta1 = 2.9606888 alpha = 2.0481982 Ne = 1376.3008121 I1 = 0.6220539 beta2 = 2.4900060 I2 = 0.3145368

So, this implies that f = 1376.3008121/27653146 = 0.00004977

The covariance matrix was

            [,1]         [,2]        [,3]         [,4]          [,5]          [,6]

[1,] -0.0084830777 -0.009578108 -6.261064 -0.001202157 -9.240969e-03 7.411367e-04 [2,] -0.0095781084 -0.009506844 -5.643501 0.002233492 -9.413388e-03 1.569764e-03 [3,] -6.2610642616 -5.643500874 -994.159681 3.312879549 -6.272385e+00 2.846079e+00 [4,] -0.0012021566 0.002233492 3.312880 0.012409315 1.755700e-03 1.736288e-03 [5,] -0.0092409687 -0.009413388 -6.272385 0.001755700 -8.667328e-03 -9.570228e-05 [6,] 0.0007411367 0.001569764 2.846079 0.001736288 -9.570228e-05 5.693951e-03

The MLE was 4041.036

Here’s a plot of the model with the data (red is the data, blue is the sum of the two models, green is the lamb2 model, and purple is the lamb1 model)

two_sir_models_6_param_for_our_data_bfgs_.pdf